Skincare Label Clarity Index

The official label record disclosed package quantity, responsible-party contact, active and inactive ingredients, complete sunscreen directions, warnings, storage, and regulated claim boundaries.

Sizes, active and inactive ingredients, application timing, water-resistance interval, reapplication, child-use limit, storage, and regulated SPF claim context were visible.

Sizes, full INCI, amount, area, AM/PM timing, eye and mouth limits, daytime sun protection, irritation response, patch testing, and quantified claim context were visible.

Variant sizes, full INCI, face and scalp directions, rinse status, frequency limits, irritation response, patch testing, and sunburn alert were disclosed together.

Sizes, full INCI, amount, area, AM/PM timing, irritation response, unbroken-skin limit, patch-test protocol, and quantified study context were visible.

Sizes, full INCI, amount, area, AM/PM timing, irritation and patch-test limits, plus participant count, cadence, and study duration for key claims were visible.

Sizes, full ingredients, dry-skin use, closed-eye handling, emulsification, rinse/wipe options, jar-water limit, routine order, and study context were visible.

Sizes, full ingredients, AM/PM placement, eye-contact limit, layering order, and instrumented claim context were visible.

Sizes, full ingredients, routine sequence, expiration, allergen statement, laboratory, dates, participant count, and quantified cosmetic endpoints were visible.

Sizes, full ingredients, head-to-toe frequency, and separate consumer and clinical claim sample sizes and periods were visible. No practical caution block was found.

Multiple sizes, full ingredients, pat/spray and layering directions, plus clinical and self-assessment durations, sample sizes, ages, and endpoints were visible.

Size, full ingredients, AM/PM amount, routine position, and eye/mouth and high-stimulation pairing limits were visible. Claim percentages lacked enough study detail for full clarity.

Size, full ingredients, final-step directions, and clinical claim timing, dates, institute, and 21-user sample were visible. No practical caution block was found.

Exact count and volume, full INCI list, dual-sided directions, and eye/freshly-shaved-skin limits were visible. Test claims named timing but not enough study detail for full claim clarity.

Size, full ingredients, formula-mixing and routine directions were visible. Clinical percentages and a low-irritation statement lacked enough visible sample and protocol detail for full claim clarity.

Exact mask identity, full ingredients, and practical wear directions were visible. Numerous percentage claims were shown, but the visible evidence lacked enough sample and protocol detail for full claim clarity.

Sizes, seven-ingredient formula, amount, patting time, face/neck area, twice-daily cadence, and routine order were clear. Transformation language lacked visible study context.

Full ingredients and detailed study footnotes were visible. The reviewed page did not expose a purchase quantity, and directions gave cadence and skin state but not a specific application area or amount.

Purpose, full ingredients, area, cadence, and routine order were clear. Purchase quantity and claim-study details were not visible in the reviewed text.

Full ingredients and clear wet, lather, face-massage, rinse, and follow-up directions were visible. Quantity and study detail for broad cleansing and barrier claims were not visible.

Full ingredients and step-by-step wet, lather, massage, rinse, dry, and follow-up directions were clear. Quantity and specific claim-study detail were not visible.

Purpose, full ingredients, application area, timing, and routine order were clear. A purchase quantity was not visible in the reviewed page text, and clinical language lacked a visible study summary.

Full ingredients and night-only face/neck placement were clear. Quantity, use-limit language, and study context for benefits were not visible in the reviewed text.

Full ingredients, face placement, amount, absorption, and bedtime cadence were clear. Quantity and study detail supporting benefit claims were not visible.

Full ingredients and damp-skin, face/neck, rinse, and AM/PM directions were visible. Quantity and specific substantiation for broad gentle/hydrating claims were not visible.

Full ingredients and three-step application directions were clear. Quantity was not visible in the reviewed text, and clinical percentages named a testing institute but omitted sample and protocol detail.

Full ingredients and rinse-off cleansing directions were visible. Quantity and sufficient protocol detail for microdust and sensitive-skin claims were not visible in the reviewed text.